Review
Seabiscuit
- Director
- Gary Ross
- Year
- 2003
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- Review date
- Thursday, July 31, 2003
How often do you get cheering and applauding when the closing credits appear in a movie? In my case, almost never. Yet
Seabiscuit is one of those movies. And I love it. I love the feeling of wanting to express the happiness, the fulfillment. I love when a movie genuinely makes you feel that good. And this one arrived just at the right moment.
Red (Tobery Maguire), a half-blind young man who has had a difficult life apart from his family, Charles Howard (Jeff Bridges), a businessman who suffered a terrible family tragedy and survived the Depression, Tom Smith (Chris Cooper), a natural horse trainer trying to make a new life, and Seabiscuit, a limp horse no one believed in, join forces to enter the horseracing world with a blast while struggling to endure their own demons in the 1930’s.
Seabiscuit is based in Laura Hillenbrand’s book which tells the true story of one of the most impressive success tales during a time when people needed something to get away from their real lives, someone to believe in. Director Gary Ross successfully blends this time of history with the inspirational story of a long shot who was able to go as far as he could.
The truth is, we all know the ending to the story, or at least we think we do, but it’s the journey to get there that makes of this the remarkable motion picture it is. You could say it’s melodramatic, but director Ross knows how to keep things under control. He never goes too far and is able to bring his movie with the warmth required to involve the audience. These four troubled souls form a family of their own and the feeling is always present that we’re invited to join as well. I know it sounds rather cheesy, but it’s the truth.
Seabsicuit is ultimately a tale about not giving up, about fighting over adversity and about second chances. It is a story about hope and courage.
Not only is the movie expertly directed, always giving a sense of excitement to the horseracing scenes and of intimacy to the more quiet ones, but it also boasts a good Randy Newman score, splendid photography and amazing production design. We’re really brought into another era, and it’s astonishing.
Tobey Maguire leaves behind his Spider-Man suit and gets into the skin of a completely different character with great ease. Jeff Bridges is sympathetic and excellent as millionaire Charles Howard. Even William H. Macy appears for some comic relief and does so expertly. But it is Chris Cooper who gives the best performance in the movie. His Tom Smith shows dignity, wisdom, but also something dark behind those eyes. I especially enjoyed the scene where Howard goes on to talk to Smith.
Inspiring, that’s the word!
“You don’t throw a whole life away just ‘cause it’s banged up a little.”
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
My Cousin Vinny
- Director
- Jonathan Lynn
- Year
- 1992
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- Review date
- Wednesday, July 30, 2003
Two young guys are mistakenly arrested for murder in a small town they’re going through in a road trip. A misunderstanding has them cooperating and nearly admitting a crime they didn’t commit, until it’s too late to take it back. Desperate, with nowhere to run, one of the boys (Ralph Macchio) recurs to an estranged cousin who’s supposed to be a lawyer by now. When the guy in question (Joe Pesci) comes to the rescue, he turns out to be far from experienced, and to make matters worse, he even lacks common sense. Good thing his worldly girlfriend (Marisa Tomei) came along too!
This hilarious courtroom comedy harmlessly makes laugh while preparing for a clear and predictable climax that doesn’t let down. Pesci is perfect in a role that suits him better than the farfetched suit he wears in one scene, Fred Gwynne is absolutely marvelous as the judge, Austin Pendleton is riotous as a stuttering lawyer… but it is Marisa Tomei who steals the movie (along with an Oscar win!) as the white trash girlfriend who never ceases to amaze everybody around, including her own boyfriend. Sure, it is Tomei who made this film notable… Good thing, since it’s such a fun ride!
“Everything that guy just said is bullshit.”
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
28 Days Later...
- Director
- Danny Boyle
- Year
- 2002
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- Review date
- Tuesday, July 29, 2003
After releasing
The Beach, director Danny Boyle pretty much got off the radar for a while. He then came back last year with a couple of movies of which
28 Days Later… got the most attention. It has just been released in the U.S. and thanks to the extraordinary publicity campaign that Fox has mounted the movie is now considered a sleeper hit. Then again, critics also loved it, so I had to see it right?
It’s London. A group of animal activists break into a laboratory where chimps are infected with a virus called “Rage” and let them loose. In a matter of 28 days the virus has almost killed the entire planet population. That’s when we meet Jim (Cillian Murphy), a common guy who suddenly wakes up in a hospital after being in a coma and realizes that London is empty… or at least that’s what it seems. Suddenly Jim stumbles into living infected humans who have the need to kill, although he also encounters Selena (Naomi Harris), Frank (Brendan Gleeson) and his daughter Hannah (Megan Burns), with whom he embarks on a road trip to get to a military facility run by Major Henry West (Christopher Eccleston).
At simple sight
28 Days Later… is a horror movie. Well, as a matter of fact it
is a horror movie, but director Danny Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland crafted their movie so that it could be a lot more. The aftertaste you get is that you’ve just witnessed a superb psychological thriller. There are some aspects that elevate the movie from being just another one in the bunch. And that’s what makes it special.
First and foremost we get to care about the four main characters in the movie. Despite the genre, the characters in the movie are well developed and fully fleshed-out. There are scary moments but also more quiet, character-driven ones, which helps us identify with what these people are going through. And when those zombie-like humans appear it can get reeeeeally scary. Like a scene in a tunnel where they are forced to change a tire as fast as they can. Nerve-wracking!
The movie takes a shocking turn once the military base finally appears. I won’t delve into details because that’s part of the fun, but I’ll just say that the movie actually makes you think. How far can humans go when put in extreme situations? Are they more dangerous than those infected creatures that act like animals? Aren’t we supposed to be the rational ones?
Director Danny Boyle fills his movie with references to George Romero’s and to
The Omega Man. A good homage in a good movie is always welcomed.
Acting-wise the movie is first-rate. These are all character actors. Actors who are not that well known to mainstream audiences. Brendan Gleeson is the highest-profile face in the cast and he does a magnificent job with his role. The whole cast is excellent though.
A movie that will get under your skin…
“That was longer than a heartbeat.”
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
Stagecoach
- Director
- John Ford
- Year
- 1939
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- Review date
- Monday, July 28, 2003
A simple stagecoach trip from one town to another becomes a dangerous journey when Geronimo threatens to attack, and is expected to strike on the travelers. Nevertheless, nine passengers fill the stagecoach: a drunken doctor (Thomas Mitchell) and a prostitute (Claire Trevor), both fleeing from a society that doesn’t want them, a bank manager (Berton Churchill) who just stole a client’s money, a pregnant woman (Louise Platt) on the way back to her husband, a whisky merchant (Donald Meek) carrying a good amount of booze (quite conveniently for the drunken doctor), a famous gambler (John Carradine), a famous outlaw (John Wayne), a sheriff (George Bancroft) and the driver (Andy Devine).
In the way, indeed, Geronimo strikes, but throughout, all the characters get to interact, in quite an interesting way.
In fact, this revolutionary western is a standout of a character study, focusing on the interaction of people from different social status and how they must find a way to stand each other, and help each other when the time comes. Of course, poignancy can be expected.
This movie, which catapulted John Wayne to big-time stardom, is also a marvel of an action flick, featuring very famous stunt work by Yakima Canutt, including an eye-popping sequence featuring Wayne’s character jumping to take charge of the situation.
A mixture of many-layered storylines, amazing action and appealing stars… how could this go wrong? No wonder it’s such a classic! John Ford was grand indeed.
Mitchell stands out from the cast. The ending is unforgettably happy. Great score, too!
“Well, I guess you can't break out of prison and into society in the same week.”
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
News
Box Office Results
- Posted by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- News date
- Monday, July 28, 2003
It was a weekend full of surprises and excitement! In a move that no one saw coming, Robert Rodriguez's
Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over was the nation's #1 movie, earning in its first weekend more than its two previous outings did over the same span. It proved to be Miramax's first number one hit in its opening weekend for over two years and it also was, amazingly enough, Sylvester Stallone's best opening ever!
Meanwhile, the second, third, fourth and fifth slots could all change once final data is released tomorrow. It was a photo-finish race between four movies, although that meant something different for each movie:
Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life underperformed,
Seabiscuit proved a success of its own and
Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl continued its impressive run with very small declines and a sure-shot at the 200-million club.
Meanwhile
Finding Nemo is one day away from becoming the highest-grossing animated feature in history, leaving behind the first run of
The Lion King back in 1994. Pretty amazing, isn't it?
Also... for the first time in box office history five movies grossed more than 20 million. Wow!
- Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over
- $32.5M, $32.5M total - Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
- $22.4M, $176.1M total - Bad Boys II
- $22M, $88.4M total - Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life
- $21.7M, $21.7M total - Seabiscuit
- $21.5M, $21.5M total - Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
- $5M, $137.4M total - The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
- $4.8M, $52.7M total - Johnny English
- $4.3M, $18.4M total - Finding Nemo
- $4M, $312.6M total - Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde
- $2.6M, $82.1M total
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Related: Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over (2003)
Permalink
News
Videogames galore!
- Posted by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- News date
- Friday, July 25, 2003
Three new movies open today and at least two of them have to do with videogames. Check out what's out there:
Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over - The third and finall installment of the saga arrives with a new twist: 3-D glasses for some of the movie's most exciting sequences. The movie is generating reviews that range from bad to mixed to excellent. They're all over the place. But I say go for it. Director Robert Rodriguez knows what he's doing and he's good.
Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life - Angelina Jolie returns as the videogame heroine in a new adventure directed by Jan De Bont. Apparently the movie is horrible. Fast, loud and noisy with no sense whatsoever. Strictly for fans I guess.
Seabiscuit - Based on a real life story, director Gary Ross and star Tobey Maguire join forces once again in a movie I happen to think is pretty good. Even though some people didn't liked it, the reaction from critics has been mostly positive. Good for everyone involved!
I also have to say, if you live in NY or LA, don't miss Mike Figgis's
Hotel with an all-star cast including my beloved Salma Hayek!!!
Have fun!
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Related: Spy Kids 3-D: Game Over (2003)
Permalink
Review
The Ninth Gate
- Director
- Roman Polanski
- Year
- 1999
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- Review date
- Thursday, July 24, 2003
This is guilty pleasures week for me, so why not talk about other movie that critics hated but that I actually liked? That's
The Ninth Gate, Roman Polanski's attempt to conquer the horror genre once again. And with Johnny Depp!!! That's a plus on my list.
Extravagant book dealer Dean Corso (Depp) has been hired to find the two other existing copies of the seventeenth-century Book of the Nine Doors to the Kingdom of Darkness, which are said to hold the key to conjuring Satan. Thus Corso travels from Madrid to Paris in search of the book.
The Ninth Gate works better if you don't take it that seriously. It is a horror movie all right, but for me it was more of a suspense yarn... trying to find the books, sorting out the clues, facing both natural and supernatural obstacles. It's all there, and I liked it.
But then detective stories usually fall flat at the end and this is no exception. The over-the-top ending involving Depp, actress Emmanuelle Seigner and a lot of fire was too much for my taste. But what the heck, the ride was fun and that's all it wanted to be.
Johnny Depp, as always, delivers a fantastic chameleonic performance. Seigner, Polanski's real-life girlfriend, doesn't fare that well. She sports one expression throughout the entire movie and that, to begin with, is no good. And Lena Olin appears as well in an interesting and creepy role.
Not for the faint of heart, but a decent entry from a brilliant director.
“Nothing is more reliable than a man whose loyalties can be bought with hard cash.”
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
News
Box Office Results
- Posted by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- News date
- Wednesday, July 23, 2003
Will Smith and Martin Lawrence reigned at the box office delivering an amazing cume and leaving those pirates with a very strong second place. Both movies were produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, so the man must be really happy right now.
Meanwhile
Finding Nemo passed the 300-million mark and it's on its way to become the highest-grossing animated movie ever. We'll see to that.
- Bad Boys II
- $46.5M, $46.5M total - Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
- $34M, $133M total - The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
- $10.1M, $42.5M total - Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
- $9.3M, $127.8M total - Johnny English
- $9.1M, $9.1M total - Finding Nemo
- $7.2M, $303.7M total - Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde
- $6.1M, $75.4M total - How to Deal
- $5.8M, $5.8M total - Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
- $3.8M, $89.2M total - 28 Days Later...
- $2.5M, $33.3M total
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Related: Bad Boys II (2003)
Permalink
Review
Assassins
- Director
- Richard Donner
- Year
- 1995
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- Review date
- Tuesday, July 22, 2003
Eight years ago Sylvester Stallone (while still a hot property) and Antonio Banderas (a newcomer at the time) decided to join forces in an action movie. I remember being very excited about the idea, and when I finally saw the movie I really liked it. Of course critics did not, so I guess it must be a guilty pleasure of mine.
Robert Rath (Sylvester Stallone) is a hitman who wants to retire as soon as possible. Bain (Antonio Banderas) is a younger hitman trying to kill Rath. So Rath joins forces with computer hacker Electra (Julianne Moore) to try and stop Bain.
As you can see the plot of the movie is pretty step-forward. Yet the way it plays is what makes it interesting. The movie was written by the Wachowski brothers and it shows. It has plot twists, weird dialogue and a rather suspense-filled finale.
You just gotta love that trick with the sunglasses.
The movie works because of the cat-and-mouse game which becomes really interesting. The romantic subplot doesn't work as well though, but it had to be included I guess.
As performances go, to tell you the truth no one excels. Everyone is just playing to their strengths without going too far, so at the end you get a lot of good performances from every cast member but there isn't a standout.
A strong entry from director Richard Donner. At least that's what I think.
“Killing a woman, it's not the same as killing a man. You have to pull the trigger a different way.”
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
Only You
- Director
- Norman Jewison
- Year
- 1994
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- Review date
- Monday, July 21, 2003
Faith (Marisa Tomei) was told by a ouija board, as a child, the name of her soul mate: Damon Bradley; this name was later corroborated by a fortune teller. As a grown woman, Faith is about to marry a man she doesn’t really love, when suddenly, out of the blue, she hears of Damon and, unable to sit down and do nothing about it, she chases him to Italy, along with her sister-in-law and life-long friend Kate (Bonnie Hunt). Through Venice and Rome they chase Damon, and at finding the alleged soul mate (Robert Downey Jr.) things start to get interesting, and quite puzzling!
Ultra-charming comedy of destiny and true love, leaded incredibly by Tomei, who’s funny and fragile, and aided amazingly by Hunt, who’s funny, especially when speaking the snappy lines the script grants her. Downey is also good and charming, and a good imitator of Gregory Peck in a scene that commemorates
Roman Holiday (1953), a movie not only referenced here but throughout.
Besides the laughs, the movie focuses a lot in the landscapes of Italy, beautifully photographed by Sven Nykvist. The score by Rachel Portman is also remarkable.
“Yeah I heard you Faith. But you’ve been waiting since you were a kid to meet this guy. This isn't the time to play hard to get.”
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
News
Threesome!
- Posted by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- News date
- Friday, July 18, 2003
So you don't know what movie you really want to see this weekend? Keep reading, because they're all quite different but each offers something special for everyone.
Bad Boys II - Will Smith and Martin Lawrence team forces once again a sequel that isn't generatin much excitement. Apparently it is more of the same.
How to Deal - Mandy Moore headlines this movie about a girl who doesn't believe in love anymore. Allison Janney also appears. As for critics, they're not really liking what they see, but the movie isn't precisely for them, is it?
Johnny English - Rowan Atkinson stars as Johnny English in this spy spoof that is getting the best reviews of the weekend, although that isn't saying much really. Apparently the movie is funny and that's what matters.
So have fun and go out there!
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Related: Bad Boys II (2003)
Permalink
Review
Breakfast at Tiffany's
- Director
- Blake Edwards
- Year
- 1961
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- Review date
- Wednesday, July 16, 2003
Holly Golightly (Audrey Hepburn) is a wild and lovely girl who lives alone in an apartment. She seems to manage pretty well in respect of money and company… but her new neighbor, writer Paul Varjak (George Peppard) sees through her and discovers a troubled human being. They become close friends, and more and more layers of her life become uncovered. Soon, as she takes choices, Paul, who’s in love with her, can’t stand to just stand there seeing her ruin her life.
Enchanting and sad, if funny, adaptation of Truman Capote’s novel, truthful in essence to the source, if taking some liberties to make it more suitable for those days’ standards (for one, Paul Varjak was gay in the novel!). Hepburn is absolutely charming as usual, in one of her most complex characters, that of a girl who looks happy but isn’t fully.
The film is filled with poignant moments, like the opening scene, Hepburn’s performance of “Moon River” (classic original song by Henry Mancini and Johnny Mercer) and certainly the finale, all accompanied by the gorgeous scoring of Mancini. Comedy relief comes particularly from Mickey Rooney, as a Chinese neighbor, a character I didn’t particularly like by the way.
Sure to make you cry and laugh… and cry again.
“Because no matter where you run, you just end up running into yourself.”
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
- Director
- McG
- Year
- 2003
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- Review date
- Tuesday, July 15, 2003
Remember when
Charlie's Angels (2000) opened and it actually got good reviews? That movie surprised even the most skeptic. By deciding to do a spoof version of the famous TV show, the creators of the movie scored a home run and it wasn’t long till a sequel was given the green light. Bill Murray didn’t come back for the ride, but everything else is there.
The plot of this second installment, if there is one, involved the Angels (Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore and Lucy Liu) as they try to get back a couple of stolen rings which might involve a former Angel (Demi Moore) gone bad. Bosley’s brother (Bernie Mac) is also there to help these beauties succeed in their mission.
So what do you do when you have to do the sequel of a movie that was extremely over-the-top? Well, you top it, and do it even more over-the-top. At least that’s what they went for, and director McG definitely succeeded in bringing some needed freshness to the movie without losing the tone these movies are so famous for. His direction is stylish and fast. He also knows what boys want, so he makes every female member of the cast appear as sexy as possible and in some very yummy situations. The movie is definitely a blast.
I’d say I liked the first one better, but this one is just as fun. It provokes a lot of giggles and never ceases to entertain. Besides, the girls are hot!!! I mean, Cameron Diaz is like a goddess. And she’s so funny and easy-going. Lucy Liu is also extraordinary and absolutely hot. And Demi Moore… wow! What a comeback! She steals the movie. She’s spectacular. Only con is Drew Barrymore, who seems out of place. Oh, and most of Bernie Mac’s stuff is moderately funny, never really taking off.
As for the action, it’s good. And the music too. There’s a lot of songs included in the movie, although some are there exclusively for laughs, and I actually enjoyed this.
Overall it’s a good summer flick. I had a great time with it.
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
Secretary
- Director
- Steven Shainberg
- Year
- 2002
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- Review date
- Monday, July 14, 2003
Lee (Maggie Gyllenhaal) is a troubled young woman who just came out of a mental hospital. She’s troubled and it soon becomes clear that her family is in great part to blame. Lee has always had trouble accepting herself, and she even cuts herself to get rid of the pain and be able to bear the world.
In an effort to readapt herself to society, feel useful, and even find a distraction, she decides to get a job. Pretty soon she’s hired as the Secretary of Lawyer E. Edward Grey (James Spader), who’s kind of silent and weird. But what does he hide? He’s certainly lonely, sickly devoted to his work, but somehow disconnected from it. That doesn’t stop him from being obsessively demanding with his Secretaries.
Surprisingly enough, Lee finds the experience to be refreshing from the get-go, even though she’s not very good at it at first. We can see that she was excited about this job even before she got it, in a very unusual way. She’s the submissive type, so she enjoys being bossed around, and unconsciously gets just exactly what she secretly pondered: A Master, yes, a sadist one, to whom she can be a loyal servant. I won’t say no more to prevent ruining the experience to anyone who has no clue (like I did), but the roles of Master and Slave are taken to quite another level by Lee and Edward.
The experience of watching this film evolve and letting the characters flow and show their inner-selves is simply fascinating. There are too many unexpected twists that do make sense but are pretty hard to realize. The most fascinating aspect of the movie is the way these characters carry something inside but don’t show it to the world, but somehow are able to recognize a matching aspect of the kind in someone else. It could even seem implausible but it does happen in real life, so there’s nothing fictitious here. And it’s a real treat!
This very original movie is in ways a drama, but mostly it’s a hilarious romantic comedy with a special touch. Spader and Gyllenhaal are a perfect match and she especially shines as her character evolves (in the end, she even
looks different). This sophisticated piece (based upon a short story by Mary Gaitskill) certainly won’t be liked by everyone, but anyone open-minded enough will love it, despite the unsettling factor, or that I would suppose.
“I’m your secretary! I’m your secretary!”
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Article
John Singleton's 'Higher Learning': Defining the Message, Offering a Solution
- Posted by
- a.k.a. Janet
- Article date
- Sunday, July 13, 2003
John’s Singleton’s 1995 film
Higher Learning uses the campus of the fictional Columbus University in California as a metaphor to address larger issues of political, sexual, and racial conflicts and prejudice that permeate American society. Colin Jacobson comments that Singleton “tried too hard to pack a huge variety of events into a short period of time” (para 12) . He also claims that because the film attempts to make such a big statement, it “can come across as heavy-handed and melodramatic” (Jacobson para 5) . Indeed, Singleton took on quite a task when he set out to make this movie—to deliver a meaningful and cohesive message about prejudice and conflict in just two short hours. Singleton’s message, as Christopher Atkinson defines it, is this: “[…] racism is a system that has been institutionalized within the very fabric of American social, economical, educational, and governmental institutions, and has always sought to dehumanize, devalue, and even destroy the black man and woman” (para 2) . So—Atkinson has defined the problem. Does Singleton offer any solutions?
A careful viewer can see that, instead of being a heavy-handed melodrama, Singleton’s film uses subtle, colorful, visual clues to piece together an imaginative puzzle that connects the stories within the larger story to construct something whole. Opening credits, with their simple design and color scheme, hint at conflicts within by presenting the title in bright red over a stark black background. The red of the title then turns to white as credits roll, moving across the screen at various angles. Then gray titles appear, with following credits still in white, always against stark black—signaling that the issues about to be addressed are often perceived as “black or white,” right or wrong, good or bad.
The film’s opening scene sets the stage for what could be called the artistic motif or design that Singleton envisioned for his film. An enormous red, white, and blue American flag fills the screen as viewers first hear martial music and then see a marching band dressed in blue jackets and white pants, the sun glinting gold off tubas and French horns, pom-pom girls dressed in blue skirts and gold tops. A podium stands under the American flag, with the white California flag flanking it on one side, the Columbus University flag in gold with blue lettering on the other. At the center of the scene stands the campus centerpiece, a gunmetal gray statue of Christopher Columbus, surrounded by beds of gold flowers, with green grass and green, leafy trees in the background. The camera pans over the crowd—all dressed in some combination of red, white, and blue—chanting and saluting in militaristic fashion. Occasional dashes of gold, drawn from the C.U. flag, pop up on T-shirts here and there.
Malik (Omar Epps), wearing a dark blue hooded sweatshirt, works his way through the chanting crowd. Next the camera focuses on Remy (Michael Rappaport), “[…] the whitest white-bread boy one could imagine” (Jacobson para 3) , dressed in a red plaid shirt, observing the speakers and the crowd with just a trace of a smile on his face. He opens his plaid shirt, exposing under it a gray T-shirt that features an unpleasant picture of a skull, complete with staring eyeballs, hinting darkly at Remy’s troubled character. Finally, the viewer is introduced to blond (white) Kristen (Kristy Swanson) as she walks across campus near the statue dressed in a blue sweater, red and blue plaid skirt, and navy knee socks. Singleton’s use throughout the film of vivid reds, whites, and blues, the colors of Americana drawn from the flag, creates for the viewer a visual bridge between the events taking place on the fictional college campus and the larger struggles in American society.
The color red, first glimpsed in the title and later in Remy’s shirt, carries with it implications of competition, sexuality, conflict, and finally violence. As Malik heads to the track and field for his first practice, we see the brick-red track—scene of competitions to come—and the red stadium seats. Partying in the street the evening before classes start, a rowdy crowd works together to tip over a bright red Volkswagen. At a frat house, the couch is covered in red leather, party-goers hold drinks in red plastic glasses, and Kristen is raped as a red neon sign blinks on and off on the wall above her. In other scenes, a bright red coke machine, empty coke cans, and beer bottles with red labels serve as props. The pool table felt is red. Professor Phipps’ office is furnished with a desk and bookcase made of rich red mahogany, and a red leather briefcase lies off to one side on the desktop. Kristen hands out fliers telling about the diversity festival she’s planned, the bright red of the printed papers foretelling the festival’s violent conclusion.
The most striking uses of the color red are seen in the angry posters tacked to the walls in Remy’s room, on the cover of the book he reads about Hitler, and as Remy visits the neo-Nazi skinheads at their apartment. In the apartment, the viewer’s eye is led directly upward from a blue swastika painted in a white circle on the floor to a huge red Nazi flag, complete with a black swastika, dominating the wall above with its message of hate and intolerance. Remy and Scott have a confrontation in that apartment opposite a smaller red Nazi flag hanging on another wall. Remy runs up flights of red stairs on his way to the roof of a building, carrying the rifle he’ll use to terrorize the campus. And finally, the viewer sees Deja’s bright red blood—the symbol of ultimate violence—as she lies dying at the foot of the Columbus statue.
The next color in Singleton’s Americana triad, white, symbolizes something quite different from angry red. It represents, among other things, the naiveté of a freshman from moneyed suburbia, as blond Kristen bleaches her hair to white and her two equally blond “friends” label her a tramp. Bright white lights glow over the party scene in the frat house. A huge white board, representing the fresh slate of a brand-new school year, organized learning, and critical thought, serves as the background for Professor Phipps as he lectures his political science class. Kristen’s white face is shown center-screen surrounded by darker faces—black, Hispanic, and Oriental—as she sits in Professor Phipps’ class listening to Malik read the list of names, a subtle suggestion that the struggles all minorities face tend to center around interactions with whites. White papers cover the professor’s desk, ready for his thoughtful notes. The starter and timers at the track meet all wear jaunty white straw hats banded with red, blue, and gold ribbons that flutter in the breeze.
The whiteness of Remy’s bare chest reflects the sad emptiness of his life as he runs down a white-painted stairwell into the evening to flag down a security van—painted a bland, institutional white, with a gold stripe and red and blue flashing lights—to ask the security officers to break up a party so he can get some sleep. The clean, white innocence of Professor Phipps’ shirtsleeves contrasts starkly with the violent red of Malik’s bloody hands and shirt as the professor holds and comforts him on the sidewalk after Deja’s death and Malik’s final confrontation with Remy.
The blue of Singleton’s Americana triad flows from scene to scene—in Kristen’s preppy knee socks, warm-up suits and uniforms at the track meet, student ID cards, and the safety lights lining campus sidewalks. Billy’s rumpled sheets are blue, as are the sheets on Kristen’s and Remy’s beds also. At the track meet, a vivid blue sky contrasts with fluffy white clouds. Campus security officers wear blue uniforms. A blue leather couch anchors the room where Taryn’s nonsexist society group meets. The blue glow of CRT screens is seen at the financial aid office and again in the library. A television reporter, who stands near the Columbus statue to report news of the campus tragedy, wears a blue blazer. In one striking shot, the viewer looks through a windowpane framed in blue to see Fudge sitting at a table playing cards. Singleton’s effective use of a luminous blue light, which seems to stream downward from a source above and to the left of the screen, illuminates night scenes such as when Taryn catches up to Kristen as she walks alone on campus. Singleton consistently uses blue to symbolize everyday sameness, commonalities, the ordinary places and things that weave the tapestry of our lives, a constant neutral ground positioned somewhere between the angry violence of red and the quiet innocence of white.
Accent colors on Singleton’s palette include flashes of gold on the patches on campus security uniforms and a C.U. pennant hanging on the frat house wall. A gold note pad rests on Professor Phipps’ desk calendar. Malik seems spotlighted in his bright gold T-shirt as he sits center-screen in Professor Phipps’ office to talk about his plans for the future. Light is filtered through gold window shades on either side of the Nazi flag in the skinheads’ apartment. In the final scene, where Malik and Kristen meet near the statue, the camera picks up patches of autumn gold among the green of distant trees. In the stadium, green grass in the infield contrasts sharply with the red track and the silver viewing stands with their red seats—a soothing color from nature to contrast with the alarm red of competition. Malik wears a soft, muted green shirt in two scenes, a variation on the usual bright green, perhaps indicating that he is growing and changing. A lovely green plant glows in the white light streaming through a window into Professor Phipps’ office, a positive image of life and renewal in the midst of tension and disorder.
The gunmetal gray of the Columbus statue is mirrored in the starter pistol at the track meet. A close-up of the gun fills the screen and then focuses down to the starter’s finger pulling the trigger, a warning of things to come. Shadowy gray figures of neo-Nazi skinheads as Remy first approaches them with Scott and later when they stand guard while Remy heads up the stairs to the roof with his rifle, the dark gray gun case that Scott opens to show Remy its contents—both symbolize evil.
Todd Ritter argues that “The film's message, if there is one at all, is muddled” (8) . It is more likely that Singleton’s message isn’t at all muddled. True, he doesn’t neatly resolve the conflicts presented in his film; almost certainly he didn’t intend to. What he does do quite effectively is to use his vivid and carefully chosen color palette as an imaginative and artistic tool to unite not only the visual aspects of his film but also his message about institutionalized racism—using the colors of Americana to telescope the problems of the larger arena of American society down to those of a smaller and more manageable college campus.
There is no neat, tidy solution, but, in the end, Singleton subtlety proposes a broad, universal solution as an unseen typewriter clatters out the word “unlearn” across the screen. “Conscious-raising education is the solution to the system. […] So, African Americans must unlearn what the system has programmed them to learn, and once they become conscious, they then can decide, intelligently, the needed solutions for the liberation, education and salvation of the black nation” (Atkinson 9).
Author: Janet Peters
May 7, 2003
Works Cited
Permalink
Review
Anger Management
- Director
- Peter Segal
- Year
- 2003
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- Review date
- Thursday, July 10, 2003
Adam Sandler has never been a favorite of mine, yet sometimes he does hit the mark and is capable of delivering good performances in good movies. Jack Nicholson, on the other hand, is Jack. No introduction. So what happens when you team them up in a movie about anger, a character trait they’ve both clearly exploited throughout their careers?
Dave Buznik (Adam Sandler) is a fairly common guy with a girlfriend (Marisa Tomei) and a moderately good job. One day he has an incident in an airplane that forces him to take anger management lessons with no other than Dr. Buddy Ridell (Jack Nicholson), a guy with some surprises of his own.
I really wanted to love this movie. I went in expecting a lot more from it. The finished product isn’t necessarily bad, but it’s definitely mediocre. It’s one of those movies which aims to be really funny but falls really short. Some of its scenes do work. There are several laugh out loud moments and that’s a good thing, but there’s a feeling to it that for each funny scene that are a lot others that don’t create the desired reaction. Thus the movie drags until it gets to its inevitable conclusion.
And talk about a conclusion!!! It is almost unbearable. It happens in a baseball stadium and I won’t tell you what happens, but I wanted to get under my seat. Even Rudy Giuliani makes a ridiculous appearance. It is all so contrived and cheesy, ugh!
As of the performances, neither Sandler nor Jack are at the top of their forms. They’re merely there because they have to. Marisa Tomei, on the other hand, is a delight as always, but her role is too short. Even Heather Graham makes an appearance… which goes on too long.
A disappointment!
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
Sabrina
- Director
- Billy Wilder
- Year
- 1954
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- Review date
- Wednesday, July 09, 2003
Sabrina (Audrey Hepburn), the daughter of the chauffeur of a wealthy family, is hopelessly in love with the younger son of the masters: David (William Holden). The latter, however, not only doesn’t notice her, but he nearly doesn’t seem to know she exists. Her crush is so bad, that her father decides to send her to Paris to become a cook. There, Sabrina becomes a distinguished lady, and comes back as such. By then, David is engaged to a woman he doesn’t fancy, a marriage by convenience arranged by David’s elder brother, businessman Linus (Humphrey Bogart). At noticing Sabrina as she is now, David falls immediately, which jeopardizes Linus’ business plans. So, Linus takes it into his hands to romance Sabrina in order to separate her from David. Strictly business, you know…
Charming if not-so-memorable Wilder romantic comedy, based on a play by Samuel A. Taylor, features (and benefits mostly from) Hepburn’s second starring role, teaming up with three other Oscar winners and huge starts: Wilder, Bogart and Holden. As expected, the result is good, but also kind of uneven, maybe because some people wanted to do things their way. I’ll be honest here: I didn’t buy Bogart’s character for a second, when romancing Hepburn; it just didn’t make sense to me, and I blame Bogart. Thank God Hepburn, at his side, makes up for it. I find Bogart’s casting (a last minute replacement for Cary Grant) to be the film’s major flaw. Luckily, the script is always refreshing, and funny. I laughed out loud more often than not, especially in the scenes featuring the boys’ father (Walter Hampden), who’s simply hilarious.
A must for Hepburn fans, and something to check out for those who admire anyone else involved.
“Hi, neighbor!”
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
American Pie
- Director
- Chris Weitz
- Paul Weitz
- Year
- 1999
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- Review date
- Tuesday, July 08, 2003
Four years have passed since
American Pie was released and created a stir so big that from then on countless movies have followed the same formula in order to attract audiences, and that’s including its two sequels. Not since
Porky’s had a movie so raunchy and aimed for teenagers hit theaters with seamless effort and it was the perfect moment to bring that genre back to the game. The movie ain’t a classic, that’s for sure, but credit should be given to whom credit deserves.
Four friends make a pact that before prom night they will lose their virginity. Jim (Jason Biggs) is a dorky-ish guy who hasn’t had much experience and is a lot into self-pleasure. Chris (Chris Klein) is trying to win Heather (Mena Suvari) over at whatever cost. Kevin (Thomas Ian Nicholas) and Vicky (Tara Reid) haven’t been able to get to the next step in their relationship. And Paul (Eddie Kaye Thomas) has rather bizarre ways to court women.
So what exactly is
American Pie? I’d say it is a gross-out comedy with a heart. That’s how I would describe it. The movie got a lot of hype because of certain scenes depicting rather raunchy behavior such as the infamous apple pie one. Audiences were more than ready for that kind of comedy and so was I. The movie, after all, is juvenile and silly, and if you go with it you can have a lot of fun, that’s for sure. Jason Biggs gets the most awkward scenes, but Seann William Scott as Stifler and Alyson Hannigan as Michelle also get their share of hilarious moments.
Surprisingly enough there are also a lot of sweet moments, including an entire sequence at the end of the movie that leaves you with a rather pleasant feeling. It’s not all as stupid as it seems… or is it? Well, I guess there’s something for everyone.
American Pie belongs to Jason Biggs, who became a sensation overnight by turning a really funny performance. But the entire cast is as good. Only Thomas Ian Nicholas and Chris Klein seem a little bit out of place at times, but nothing preoccupying. Shannon Elizabeth also appears as a foreign student and certainly gets all the attention. Eugene Levy, as Jim’s father, steals the movie by appearing in only a couple of scenes. Absolutely hilarious!
An old-fashioned movie with a modern flavor.
“It’s not a space shuttle launch, it’s sex!”
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
Five Easy Pieces
- Director
- Bob Rafelson
- Year
- 1970
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- Review date
- Monday, July 07, 2003
Jack Nicholson plays an accomplished pianist raised in a family of musicians and art appreciators, who suddenly, for no particular reason, abandons his artistic family and life to become an everyman. The movie starts when he’s working in an oil rig, living with a trashy girl (Karen Black), bowling and drinking beer. Soon, however, he visits his sister (Lois Smith) and she talks him into coming home for a while. His visit, during which he relives memories and reevaluates his life, makes up for a fascinating character study, silently shocking at every turn.
Nicholson is simply superb in the complex character of a man who thinks he knows what he’s doing, but suddenly realizes he simply does not. Amazing support comes from the whole cast, but especially Black, Smith, Billy Green Bush (as an oil rig pal) and Susan Anspach (as a contrasting love interest). Helena Kallianiotes is hilarious as a hitchhiker who’s got enough to complain about the world; during road trip sequence, Nicholson speaks a famous “chicken salad sandwich” speech, which has probably survived in memorabilia more than the movie itself. That doesn’t mean this film is not an excellent one, lovingly written by Carole Eastman (as Adrien Joyce) and sharply directed by Rafelson.
“I want you to hold it between your knees.”
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
News
Box Office Results
- Posted by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- News date
- Sunday, July 06, 2003
Arnold is back!!! His new movie opened to record-breaking numbers during the 4th of July weekend.
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines now stands as the second highest opener for an R-rated movie only behind this year's
The Matrix Reloaded. That's certainly good news for the Terminator himself.
Meanwhile Reese Witherspoon had a great opening but Brad Pitt kind of flopped. Mmmh, that's good and bad, but hey, you just can't have it all!
- Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
- $44M, $72.5M total - Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde
- $22.9M, $31.9M total - Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
- $14.2M, $67.2M total - Finding Nemo
- $11M, $274.9M total - The Hulk
- $8.2M, $117M total - Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas
- $6.8M, $10M total - 28 Days Later...
- $6M, $20.6M total - The Italian Job
- $4.2M, $84M total - Bruce Almighty
- $4M, $228.7M total - 2 Fast 2 Furious
- $2.4M, $119.3M total
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Related: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)
Permalink
News
Blonde Terminator of the Seven Seas
- Posted by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- News date
- Friday, July 04, 2003
Hey guys!! Long weekend, huh? All this Independence Day stuff is so amazing… You just gotta love this weekend! And why not go to the movies between celebration and celebration? In case you're planning to, here's what's new for you:
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines - Some didn't expect much, some thought it'd be good as long as Schwarzenegger was in it… The result? A not-bad movie, if one that could've been better, or so say most critics. But all are happy with the action and visual effects, and I guess it should be given a look.
Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde - This one's getting really bad reviews. Too bad, 'cause Reese is so cool and the first movie was so funny. But this is obviously an attempt to make money, isn't it? So it's a good option for a good, mindless time.
Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas - Brad Pitt and Catherine Zeta-Jones lend their voices to the animated characters of this Dreamworks picture… which is said to be so-so, if undeniably entertaining.
So there you have it. Options, options… but the choice is all yours. See ya!
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Related: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)
Permalink
Review
First Knight
- Director
- Jerry Zucker
- Year
- 1995
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- Review date
- Thursday, July 03, 2003
First Knight is another one of those movies I first saw when I started to seriously go to the cinema.
Apollo 13 and
Outbreak are other examples. These are movies that have stayed with me for far too special reasons, and it also helps they’re all really good.
King Arthur (Sean Connery) has just proposed marriage to Lady Guinivere (Julia Ormond) when she meets Lancelot (Richard Gere), a free-spirited man who serves him. A love triangle then forms while our heroine is kidnapped by evil Prince Malagant (Ben Cross).
There are a lot of things
First Knight does good that could’ve gone real wrong. Director Jerry Zucker certainly knew what he was doing, since his hand can be felt behind the camera at all points. The movie is vibrant, powerful, romantic, adventurous. It’s a passionate epic that succeeds mainly because of the talent involved and a generally strong script that keeps things interesting.
The love triangle between the three main characters is definitely the highpoint of the movie. We don’t really know who we want to root for, yet in our hearts we hope Lancelot will get the girl. There are many heart-breaking scenes between them, especially one involving the three of them in an unexpected encounter. Those scenes get us into the characters’ minds so we experience their feelings with them.
There is also a lot of action for less-romantic moviegoers. A lot of swordplay and horse-riding is guaranteed. And the climax is spectacular.
The production design of the movie is just marvelous. You feel like you’re entering a magic world. Camelot looks great. And it sounds good too. Jerry Goldsmith delivers a wonderful score not easy to forget.
Richard Gere is excellent as Lancelot. Some say he shouldn’t have sported an American accent, yet I didn’t even care. He is just good in the role. Sean Connery, on the other hand, is extraordinary. This man needs no comments to highlight his work. He just knows what he’s doing. And Julia Ormond is breath-taking as well. Her performance is really brave and touching at the same time. Marvelous.
An adventurous movie for those adventurous at heart.
“Only a fool wants what he cannot have.”
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
Review
Roman Holiday
- Director
- William Wyler
- Year
- 1953
- Rating

- Reviewed by
- Gon Curiel a.k.a. Groucho
- Review date
- Wednesday, July 02, 2003
While in Rome, a young princess (Audrey Hepburn) on tour around Europe gets tired of the routine she’s lived her whole life and all of a sudden decides to run away. She does so quite carelessly by the way, just letting herself go, but luckily, she falls in safe hands: those of a reporter (Gregory Peck) who gives her shelter. He doesn’t know she’s a princess, but later, as he finds out, he decides to write the story of a lifetime, which will earn him money and recognition. She doesn’t know his intentions, so it’s quite easy for him to get what he wants, with the help of his photographer pal (Eddie Albert). However, as he falls in love with Her Highness, the heart complicates everything.
Ultra-charming, straightforward romantic story of two very different people whose lives are unexpectedly tied together. Though they lie to each other on the surface, their feelings make their time together absolutely unforgettable, for both them and us.
The screen presence of Audrey Hepburn simply took the breath away of everyone who saw this film at its time or at any other time, her first starring break, which earned her an Oscar. She’s fantastic as ever, full of effortless charm and vitality, but also a lot of class. Gregory Peck is kind of wooden, something that seemed wrong to me at first, but then turned out to be just perfect for the character. I fell for him as much as I fell for her. The couple is fantastic. Albert, by the way, lends great comedic support.
A lot of pleasant and poignant scenes fill the running time. Who can forget the princess’ first cigarette, or their visit to the mouth of truth (mostly adlibbed by Peck, with a real-life reaction by Audrey), or the party that goes wrong? Toward the end, Peck and Albert share outstanding minutes as they see the pictures the latter took. The very final scene is heartwarming and heartbreaking at the same time, and unforgettable.
Beautifully photographed, filmed fully in Rome. Something I want to mention especially is the rare score by Georges Auric; while it manages to stick to the mind, it feels out of place more often than not. A rare work indeed, but still, in ways, a memorable one.
What’s surely memorable however, is this charming movie, often imitated, often inspiring to others, always cherished in memory as long as one lives.
Ann: I’m a good liar too, aren’t I, Mr. Bradley?
Joe: The best I ever met.
Gon C Curiel en Twitter |
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Permalink
News
Box Office Results
- Posted by
- José Ruiloba a.k.a. Morris
- News date
- Tuesday, July 01, 2003
After a string of spectacular weekends, the box office finally came to a halt as
Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle opened to strong numbers but wasn't able to top the original's first weekend cume.
There were also really bad news for Universal, as
The Hulk flopped in its second weekend decreasing an alarming 70%. That's definitely not good.
Meanwhile a much smaller movie,
28 Days Later..., opened with surprisingly strong numbers. Could it be a sleeper hit?
- Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
- $38M, $38M total - The Hulk
- $18.4M, $100.2M total - Finding Nemo
- $13.8M, $253.9M total - 28 Days Later...
- $9.7M, $9.7M total - Bruce Almighty
- $6.2M, $221.3M total - 2 Fast 2 Furious
- $5.7M, $113.4M total - The Italian Job
- $5.4M, $76.6M total - Rugrats Go Wild
- $3.5M, $30.8M total - Hollywood Homicide
- $3M, $27.3M total - Alex and Emma
- $2.6M, $11.5M total
CriticSociety en Twitter |
CriticSociety en FacebookShare on Facebook |
Share on Twitter
Related: Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)
Permalink
people search google wrote at 3/6/2013 10:54:07 PM:
wow, can_t believe how fast times past by, can_t believe it_sfriday once again and that method, friday beer night
with friends, he he